Live December 29 – TYT, the Everything App, MAGA meltdowns and whatever else takes our fancy.

Play Video
  • Political content, like that produced by The Young Turks (TYT), often conflates entertainment with real politics, distracting from the procedural and research-driven nature of genuine political work.
  • TYT's recent ideological pivot adopts right-wing framing, perpetuating misinformation and undermining the progressive movements they once supported, all without engaging with evidence or research.
  • Media manipulation by right-wing actors, including tactics like bot armies, paid promotions, and mass reporting, skews public discourse and pressures creators into echoing harmful narratives.
  • TYT risks audience capture, where creators prioritise sensationalism and clickbait over truth, inadvertently enabling bad actors and delegitimising real activism.
  • The internet’s role in shaping real-life politics is profound, but the current content-driven culture rewards division and misinformation, demanding a collective rejection of these harmful dynamics.

The internet, for all its revolutionary promise, has become an exhausting arena of bad faith arguments, misinformation, and performative outrage. Political content, particularly on platforms like The Young Turks (TYT), blurs the lines between entertainment and politics, and it’s this conflation that’s fracturing meaningful discourse. People treat media personalities like political leaders, forgetting that real politics is procedural, tedious, and unglamorous. Instead, they flock to spectacle, mistaking commentary for activism and conflating debate with substance.

Let’s be clear: politics isn’t designed for viral soundbites. It’s about policy, research, and negotiating between stakeholders with conflicting interests. It’s boring. It’s procedural. It’s the opposite of whatever the current content economy has become. Yet, platforms like TYT—once a pioneer of progressive media—now seem content to capitalise on outrage while inadvertently reinforcing harmful narratives.

This brings me to TYT’s recent ideological pivot, which reeks of opportunism. They’ve embraced right-wing framing under the guise of “addressing uncomfortable truths,” perpetuating the same misinformation tactics they once critiqued. Worse, they’ve accepted this framing without any serious engagement with research or evidence. For example, pushing the tired narrative that the left is inherently authoritarian. Here’s a quick reality check: authoritarianism is a system of government requiring state power. Twitter trolls with anime avatars calling you names? Not authoritarian. Annoying? Absolutely. But authoritarian? Please.

The crux of the issue lies in media manipulation. Right-wing actors have perfected the art of platform manipulation—boosting narratives they favour and punishing dissent. They wield tactics like bot armies, paid promotions, and mass reporting to inflate engagement for allies and suppress critics. These tools aren’t exclusive to the right; TYT has employed them in the past. But it’s frustrating to see them now falling victim to the same traps, seemingly unaware of the forces at play.

I’ve watched this play out before. Cultural issues like gender debates are weaponised to polarise and recruit. When I first engaged with these conversations, I didn’t realise I was being played. It took time to understand how these discussions were co-opted by bad actors seeking to fracture the left. The playbook hasn’t changed: inflame division, recruit disillusioned individuals, and funnel them into reactionary pipelines. TYT’s current trajectory risks the same fate, trading substantive analysis for clickbait and outrage.

Here’s what’s truly insidious: TYT likely believes they’re the exception. They think they can outsmart these manipulative forces. They can’t. Nobody can. The second you step out of line, the machine that props you up will crush you. It’s a Faustian bargain, and it’s painful to watch TYT stumble down this path, seemingly oblivious to the consequences.

The broader problem is that content culture rewards this behaviour. Platforms incentivise sensationalism, rewarding creators who lean into controversy. TYT’s recent pivot seems to be a textbook case of audience capture: saying what’s profitable, not what’s true. This isn’t just disappointing—it’s dangerous. When a platform with TYT’s reach starts parroting bad faith arguments, it undermines the very foundations of progressive movements. It delegitimises real activism and creates a vacuum for misinformation to flourish.

I care about the left because I’m of the left. It’s not an outfit I can put on or take off; it’s woven into every fibre of who I am. That’s why it’s infuriating to see platforms like TYT, which could have been bastions of truth and critical thought, reduced to amplifying the same tired tropes as the right. They’re being played, and they don’t even seem to know it.

This isn’t just about TYT; it’s about the erosion of meaningful political discourse in the age of content. The internet isn’t real life, but it shapes real life in profound ways. Until we collectively reject this culture of superficiality and manipulation, we’re doomed to repeat these cycles of division and distraction. And if TYT’s trajectory is anything to go by, the stakes couldn’t be higher.

Leave a Comment